| Author |
Message |
philw
|
|
Post subject: RE: SCUK Insurance - Major Change. Bad.
Posted: Mar 08, 2011 - 08:58 PM
|
|

First post: Nov 30, 2004
Total posts: 519
Location: uk
|
|
|
|
|
 |
dunx
|
|
Post subject: RE: SCUK Insurance - Major Change. Bad.
Posted: Mar 09, 2011 - 02:43 PM
|
|

First post: Oct 07, 2004
Total posts: 9314
Location: Herts, UK
Status: Offline
|
|
Okay, all sorted. It's back down to a group of 2 and there's an extra specific exclusion been added to say you're not covered if off piste alone.
The new policy document is available for download at www.snowboardclub.co.uk/insurance (see page 19).
The revised terms cover any policy brought since 1st January 2011 for any trip you have not yet started.
Happy to help! |
_________________ SCUK Editor • Me on Facebook • Neverland
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
Sidget
|
|
Post subject: RE: SCUK Insurance - Major Change. Bad.
Posted: Mar 09, 2011 - 02:48 PM
|
|

First post: Sep 10, 2006
Total posts: 10680
Location: Under a lil rock
Status: Offline
|
|
Absolutely brilliant  |
_________________ You do you, and i'll do me
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
ChasKi
|
|
Post subject: RE: SCUK Insurance - Major Change. Bad.
Posted: Mar 10, 2011 - 09:51 AM
|
|

First post: Mar 04, 2009
Total posts: 2481
Location: Plymouth/Stroud
Status: Offline
|
|
Great stuff, glad to hear it's back to two people officially and signed off on  |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
dunx
|
|
Post subject: RE: SCUK Insurance - Major Change. Bad.
Posted: Mar 10, 2011 - 10:51 AM
|
|

First post: Oct 07, 2004
Total posts: 9314
Location: Herts, UK
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Goofmeister
|
|
Post subject: Re: RE: SCUK Insurance - Major Change. Bad.
Posted: Mar 10, 2011 - 10:18 PM
|
|
First post: Sep 15, 2008
Total posts: 71
Status: Offline
|
|
|
dunx wrote:
I'll tweak the thread title to say it's sorted I think!
As the OP I say... go for it!! |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
gaz_5_m
|
|
Post subject: RE: Re: RE: SCUK Insurance - Major Change. Bad.
Posted: Nov 15, 2011 - 10:32 AM
|
|

First post: Jan 20, 2010
Total posts: 270
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
|
|
First off, apologies for reviving this thread!
I'm trying to answer a question thats been raised elsewhere where I've recommended this policy. I've had a search through the forum and read the policy document and cant see anywhere where this specific question is covered off, so rather than start another Insurance thread thought I'd ask here as its a similar (off piste) theme.
In the policy, its states that you are covered off piste:
"with a qualified instructor or in a group of not less than 2 persons in possession of working communications or portable telephone. No cover for riding off-piste alone or winter sports activities against local authority advice."
And the question raised:
Local Authority Advice would generally state that to go off piste you should have a shovel, probe and transceiver. Thats fine and perfectly reasonable for what we'd all consider proper off piste.
However, between runs (in the trees for example) is technically off piste (though in North America generally "in bounds"). Would the SCUK insurance company wriggle out of a claim in that instance if you didn't have the avy kit on you?
Basically, does our policy expect you to have full avy kit if you break your leg in the 10 feet of "off piste" between runs if the local authority recommends it "off piste"? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
photogeeza
|
|
Post subject: RE: SCUK Insurance - Major Change. Bad.
Posted: Nov 15, 2011 - 02:21 PM
|
|
First post: Oct 06, 2010
Total posts: 24
Status: Offline
|
|
Bumpty bump.!!
So was the revised working sent from TGIC to the underwriters approved after all.!!
Are we covered to go off piste with just one friend ? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
charlie
|
|
Post subject: RE: SCUK Insurance - Major Change. Bad.
Posted: Nov 15, 2011 - 02:23 PM
|
|

First post: Oct 11, 2004
Total posts: 8993
Location: York
Status: Offline
|
|
| Yes, that's what it says above... |
_________________ Official SCUK crash test dummy.
Photography
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|