| Author |
Message |
lez_s
|
|
Post subject: California Senate Passes Snowboard Helmet Bill
Posted: Jun 02, 2010 - 12:50 PM
|
|

First post: Oct 11, 2004
Total posts: 11592
Location: Whistler
Status: Offline
|
|
What you think? I think its a good idea.
Quote:
In a 21-13 bipartisan vote, the California State Senate resoundingly approved a bill that would require all children under 18 to wear a helmet while skiing or snowboarding on the state’s slopes. According to SB 880, authored by Senator Leland Yee (D-San Francisco), parents of helmetless hooligans would be subject to a maximum fine of $25 and resorts would be required to post signs and information about the law.
The bill still needs to be passed by the state legislature before it can go to Governor Schwarzenegger’s desk for final approval, but the strong support in the senate as well as the backing of groups such as the following are making this appear more and more likely:
California Psychological Association, American College of Emergency Physicians, California Brain Injury Association, California´s Children´s Hospital Association, California Chiropractic Association, California Hospital Association, California Medical Association, California Nurses Association, California Psychiatric Association, California Travel Industry Association, Children´s Advocacy Institute, and the National Academy of Neuropsychology.
Helmet manufacturers and resort ski and snowboard shops have got to be inwardly rooting for the new bill to become law as it would without a doubt send helmet sales through the roof. California boasts more snowsports participants and more snowboarders than any other state. In fact, according to SIA, 19.4% of all snowboarders, or nearly 1.5 million shreds, call California home. That’s a lot of helmets, but also a lot of forced helmet use by potentially pissed off riders.
SIA reported that high profile injuries helped helmet sales reach an all time high this year of 1.2 million units, and that’s without a law.
http://business.transworld.net/38058/fe ... d/[/quote] |
_________________ 'Get busy livin' or get busy dyin'
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
dunx
|
|
Post subject: RE: California Senate Passes Snowboard Helmet Bill
Posted: Jun 02, 2010 - 02:52 PM
|
|

First post: Oct 07, 2004
Total posts: 9071
Location: Herts, UK
Status: Offline
|
|
| If you take the stance that a minor is not responsible for their actions, then yes, I think mandatory lids are fine for lessons and perhaps parks. Not so sure about recreational riding and it certainly goes against the grain for adults. |
_________________ SCUK Editor • Me on Facebook • Neverland
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
ColdComfort
|
|
Post subject: RE: California Senate Passes Snowboard Helmet Bill
Posted: Jun 02, 2010 - 03:00 PM
|
|

First post: Dec 03, 2009
Total posts: 1306
Location: Vancity
Status: Offline
|
|
Yeah fair enough i guess - less chance of facing a murder rap and getting 'the chair' next time u mow down half the local ski school !  |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
eldi
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jun 02, 2010 - 03:16 PM
|
|

First post: Oct 18, 2004
Total posts: 1593
Location: London
Status: Offline
|
|
| Good idea but the fine is a joke @ £17 you could get caught n fined multiple times before it costs you more than a lid |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
Branny
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jun 02, 2010 - 03:35 PM
|
|
First post: Oct 11, 2004
Total posts: 4559
Location: Is in the U freakin' K
Status: Offline
|
|
i think it's a good thing, i don't let my kids ride without helmets on, and it makes mom & pop occasional skier think a little bit about little Johnny's safety..
yes 17 quids not much.... but at 13-14 how much trouble would you of been in if you kept taking home 17 quid a day fines??? |
_________________ http://www.facebook.com/brannyuk
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
DTMVTEC
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jun 03, 2010 - 01:21 AM
|
|

First post: Sep 14, 2008
Total posts: 397
Status: Offline
|
|
Hmmm kids all ride alone.... as if the shred punks are going to give up their names or addreses to pay money...
...and riding heavenly u would just head for the nevada border or say u just came from there with no helmet?..ha ha..... |
_________________ Slip and Slide, Let it Ride
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
Branny
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jun 03, 2010 - 04:37 AM
|
|
First post: Oct 11, 2004
Total posts: 4559
Location: Is in the U freakin' K
Status: Offline
|
|
|
DTMVTEC wrote:
Hmmm kids all ride alone....
from older teens yes, but my 7 year old isn't lapping the park on his own yet..... he's not quite left me behind on the skills front yet |
_________________ http://www.facebook.com/brannyuk
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
dashie
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jun 03, 2010 - 07:06 AM
|
|

First post: Sep 24, 2007
Total posts: 4220
Location: stockport/dundee
Status: Offline
|
|
| Helmet companies are gonna hate this rule. |
_________________ Boobs, booze, snowboarding, in that order!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
R1ch
|
|
Post subject:
Posted: Jun 03, 2010 - 09:27 AM
|
|

First post: Jan 07, 2005
Total posts: 572
Location: London
Status: Offline
|
|
On the one hand I think it's a good thing, but then I think that anyone taking lessons or who are very young should be wearing a helmet anyway.
What I'm not so sure about is exactly how they are going to police this?
Are there going to be regular Police Patrols on the hill stopping people?
Or are they going to turn on the resorts and fine them if they are not stopping and fining offenders?
I suppose in North America it's more common to have ticket inspectors with low access points where you could make sure everyone has a helmet before they go up, in contrast to Europe where there are many access points with automatic pass barriers.
I can see what they are trying to do though. If you have everyone up to 18 wearing a helmet, chances are when they reach 18, they will keep the helmet. Thus future generations will be much more inclined to wear one than past generations. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|