Create a free SCUK account and get access to the forums and our regular newsletter. May 25, 2012

Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Printable version Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
adverseOfflineNon-member
Post subject:   PostPosted: Mar 13, 2010 - 01:14 PM



First post: Feb 24, 2010
Total posts: 324

Status: Offline
Whether they fit you or not, and thus are the correct size for you or not, you do have an argument to say that you were deceived over the stated size of them. If you're led to believe they are a particular size this impacts your decision to purchase them because you have to consider the sizes your bindings can accomodate. Believing they are a specific size, and therefore will fit your bindings, can be argued is part of the purchasing decision, not just whether they fit (as 'fit' is entirely subjective).

I guess the first thing you need to do is have some proof of exactly what size they are - get the actual measurements of the sizes from 32 and see how your boots compare. If they are indeed a larger size than stated, and the actual size has been hidden, you may have a case under the Sale of Goods Act and Trading Standards may well be able to help you with your case. Or perhaps try Citizen's Advice for help.

However, the fact you have taken so long to figure this out, and have worn the boots beyond just trying them out, weakens your case considerably. I can't remember the Sale of Goods Act specifically but it does place time limits on acceptance, and the rules are slightly different for mail order items. 6 months is ringing a bell for some reason......like 6 months is a reasonable amount of time after initial purchase for you to decide there is a problem, or for the perceived problem to potentially be of some other origin than a manufacturing defect etc. Though if the deception is as blatant and you think it might be, then you just never know, it may bring in other cases of law beyond Sale of Goods.
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
fra3erOfflineSCUK Member
Post subject:   PostPosted: Mar 13, 2010 - 03:30 PM



First post: May 20, 2009
Total posts: 292
Location: Stewarton
Status: Offline
get trading standards involved asap. It wont matter how long u have had them for, if they can decieve you who else are they deceiving. 32 wouldnt stick a sticker over a sticker, that will be the shops doing to sell them. It costs them more to stick a sticker over than just sell them as wrongly marked. Hope you get it sorted.

_________________
Remember the Tufty Club?

www.facebook.com/fra3er
 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger  
Reply with quote Back to top
philwNon-member
Post subject:   PostPosted: Mar 14, 2010 - 08:36 PM



First post: Nov 30, 2004
Total posts: 519
Location: uk
My advice of course is worth what you paid for it and my liability similarly limited.

I'm not sure what "trading standards" is, but you'd probably be more concerned with the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (as amended) or the Consumer Protection Act. The problem I would say is that it sounds like you may have accepted the goods, which basically screws your case.

Locking the door after the horse has bolted...
It's really, really a bad idea to buy stuff you've not ridden, and buying boots when you can't go straight out and ride them is, well, not advisable in my view. Standing in your gear at home or riding it on a small uk slope is probably not enough - you should buy the gear at a resort, then ride it immediately. If it's not right, then they can fix it or swap it immediately.
The consumer rush people get from paying over the odds for gear in the UK has its consequences.

That said, I think the supplier is behaving very poorly if they sold you something which by definition was not suitable for purpose (it was clearly the wrong size, therefore not fit). Whilst your acceptance (failure to complain for a long time) of the goods doesn't help, they sold them in the summer so there's no way you could sensibly check them out - that's a risk which I'd argue you both share, selling/buying in summer in a snowless country.

So I'd first try to talk to someone senior in the shop and see if you can get them to negotiate. At worst they don't need to make a profit from your problems. They charge punters a lot for boots but in the business they're worth nothing so they can sort it if they want to.

If that doesn't work, then if you can be bothered (I always can), then find your local CAB and take some free legal advice. If you do have a case, they'll tell you. Then warn the shop, file the papers, and they'll settle out of court - it never fails (if you have a case).

_________________
powder mountain CoC snowboarding safety
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
jimrutOfflineNon-member
Post subject:   PostPosted: Mar 14, 2010 - 09:39 PM



First post: Nov 20, 2007
Total posts: 22

Status: Offline






 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
jimrutOfflineNon-member
Post subject:   PostPosted: Mar 14, 2010 - 09:40 PM



First post: Nov 20, 2007
Total posts: 22

Status: Offline
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
ChasKiOfflineSCUK Member
Post subject:   PostPosted: Mar 15, 2010 - 12:23 AM



First post: Mar 04, 2009
Total posts: 2481
Location: Plymouth/Stroud
Status: Offline
would prolly have helped if you only ripped the UK size off one of them Razz
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Printable version Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Powered by PNphpBB2 © 2003-2006 The PNphpBB Group
Credits

SCUK MEMBERSHIP - JOIN FOR JUST £15

PROMO

SCUK SEARCH
Loading

LOGIN




 


 Log in Problems?
 New User? Sign Up!


THE SCUK SHOP

PROMO

COMMUNITY
Recent Forum Posts
 Go to last postFlow jewel 143 or 146(1)
 by siany
 Go to last postImport/Duty Fee's: Buying from the US(38)
 by CjKit
 Go to last postFS: Dakine Blade Rucksack 27L(1)
 by Mr.BadDog
 Go to last postLake Tahoe(10)
 by rob_vet69
 Go to last postIt ain't over till it's over...(18)
 by dashie
 Go to last postThanks to Capita and The Riders Lounge(1)
 by Branny
 Go to last postChatham - Main slope misting system inst...(1)
 by Branny
 Go to last postRandom atomic training aid !!!(4)
 by jazown
 Go to last postFS: Celtek Goves, Dakine Bag, Nixon Belt...(6)
 by MLF
 Go to last postSummer shredding with Onyx(0)
 by Onyx
 Go to last postFear of catching an edge on boxes(25)
 by flexso
 Go to last postKashmir Gulmarg Insurance?(15)
 by dunx
 Go to last postPM'S(10)
 by dunx
 Go to last postHelp me please!(7)
 by jacks
 Go to last postNiseko Japan Season Edit(7)
 by snowbadger

Go to the SCUK Forum

Users Online
There are 6 unlogged users and 6 registered users online

You are an anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

OFFICIAL PARTNERS

FOLLOW US
Follow us on Facebook.com/snowboardclub Follow us on at Twitter.com/snowboardclub Follow our News via this feed

FEATURED