Create a free SCUK account and get access to the forums and our regular newsletter.
Nov 19, 2008
SCUK INSURANCE
ADVERTISEMENT
SCUK MEMBERSHIP
SNO!zone(Castleford, Scotland, Milton Keynes) 15-20% off or Free Session Chill Factore (Manchester) 10% off all slope time SnowDome(Tamworth) Free Session and other discounts
Joined: Aug 02, 2007
Posts: 837
Location: The wrong place at the right time
Status: Offline
I ride in size 10 Burton rulers and my board is 250 wide and thats fine for me though this may depend on your stance and binding angles- too narrow stance and little to no back foot angle may give you too much toe/heel overhang.
Thats quite a big difference in width although as I've found with size 10's you are on the edge of needing a mid wide/wide board so it probally wouldn't cause you too many probs if you went for the wide. A board thats too wide can cause as many probs as one that you have too much overhang on.
Wider boards are in theory slightly slower edge to edge, though if you are a beginner that prob wont be an issue. They are however slightly more stable on landings and have a bit more float.
As for the Anagram...sorry never ridden one. Best thing to do is find your local demo centre and try a few boards out.
Thanks for the reply, think ill stay away from the wide boards. and maybe look at boards that have a mid width of at leath 250.
Guess not many people have had a K2 Anagram, maybe that says enough about it?
rabram83
Post subject: RE: K2 Anagram Posted: May 08, 2008 - 06:43 PM
Joined: May 08, 2008
Posts: 1
Location: Manchester
Status: Offline
Hey! I have a K2 Anagram 163cm wide snowboard; I think it looks more kick arss than some of the other K2 boards. It's definitely wide enough for boarders with huge feet and its got great flex. Another cool thing about the board is that you can put a 3 degree bevel on the base edge. And its twin tip so on price it beats the Burton’s twin.
SCUK 
FAQ
Search
Register
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Maximize
RSS Feed
SCUK on Facebook