Create a free SCUK account and get access to the forums and our regular newsletter. Feb 09, 2012

Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Printable version Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
ArdkorOfflineSCUK Member
Post subject: Insurance at Indoor Slopes  PostPosted: Mar 10, 2010 - 09:01 PM



First post: Mar 01, 2010
Total posts: 106
Location: Manchester
Status: Offline
If you are hit by someone at an indoor ski slope and they injure you and damage your gear, are you covered by any form of insurance (public liability by slope owner etc.) or would you need to go through small claims court to recover damages from the person at fault?
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger  
Reply with quote Back to top
mini.OfflineNon-member
Post subject: RE: Insurance at Indoor Slopes  PostPosted: Mar 11, 2010 - 12:10 AM



First post: Jun 16, 2008
Total posts: 1648
Location: a world of my own, but mostly sheffield.
Status: Offline
or you could accept that snowsports are inherintly dangerous and just move on with life.

not all blame has to lead to a claim.

_________________
www.minus-nine.co.uk

www.skicourchevel.net
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
philboarderOfflineNon-member
Post subject:   PostPosted: Mar 11, 2010 - 02:42 AM



First post: Jul 29, 2006
Total posts: 887

Status: Offline
Youve got to be kidding do you really recon these places would run with the possbility of getting sue'd.

Dont do snowsports if this is what you worried about
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
BrannyOfflineSCUK Member
Post subject:   PostPosted: Mar 11, 2010 - 05:41 AM



First post: Oct 11, 2004
Total posts: 4559
Location: Is in the U freakin' K
Status: Offline
i agree with the guys above on the don't start claiming BS

however all the indoor and outdoor slopes have to be legally covered from an insurance point of view, most places get you to sign an indemnity when you ride so you have probably already put yourself on a poor starting point

you would have to prove that the slope where at fault, and where not showing duty of care with regards to condition and safety of the facilities and/or allowing people who are not sufficiently skilled to use the slope.

if neither of these fit the bill or can be proven then a personnel claim against the person who hit you may be a way.... but it'd have to be again very cut and dry that they where being malicious or reckless...

the last thing UK slopes need is the no win no fee mentality where every time someone take a stack they try and sue someone.... especially as that skier who i made cry when i scorpion'd her last week would take me to the cleaners hahaha!!!!

_________________
http://www.facebook.com/brannyuk
 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger  
Reply with quote Back to top
TiberiusOfflineNon-member
Post subject:   PostPosted: Mar 11, 2010 - 07:15 AM



First post: Oct 17, 2004
Total posts: 9411
Location: 10 mins from Cas
Status: Offline
Well, the op isn't asking whether we agree with the make a claim culture, he's asking a simple question of insurance. Yes, slopes need insurance.

On the wider question, the slopes plainly state that in order to use them, you have to be able to control your speed etc. We all know they don't really police this and quite often people are on the slope who are quite frankly a danger to themselves and others. Sorry but I don't agree with the above, if I injure myself, that my problem, but if I get injured by some idiot the slopes have let on, even though he wasn't of an acceptable standard then why should my family suffer because I can't earn?

Once I was on the slope and a family came on. the youngest boy clearley had never skiied before and the father was trying to teach him. Any time you passed this lad he fell dramatically to the floor and spread his hands out wide, and the father glared at you as if it was your fault. Quite frankly it was outright dangerous. I mentioned to the liftie and he gave some excuse about they couldn't throw them off becuase they had booked 4 hours or some non-sensical excuse. I left, it really was impossible to use the slope.

_________________
The Disclaimer:

Tiberius is a socialist. His views may not necessarily be supported by his owner.
 
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Reply with quote Back to top
Sym0nOfflineSCUK Member
Post subject:   PostPosted: Mar 11, 2010 - 07:46 AM



First post: Dec 20, 2009
Total posts: 545
Location: Nottingham
Status: Offline
I'd guess that there will be a sign somewhere along the lines of them accepting no responsibility for injuries sustained whilst on the slope caused by recklessness or incompetence.

I agree with the above though, the claim culture in this country sucks ass. Fair enough if you're legitimately injured through no fault of your own, but if people start claiming in the fridges it will be for all amount of silly sh1t reasons; like them falling over and bruising their arse or water damage to clothes. Rolling Eyes
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
yellowlalaOfflineNon-member
Post subject:   PostPosted: Mar 11, 2010 - 08:21 AM



First post: Mar 12, 2007
Total posts: 1594

Status: Offline
Branny wrote:

especially as that skier who i made cry when i scorpion'd her last week would take me to the cleaners hahaha!!!!


Laughing but we all concurred that the tears = bonus points.

If you have Winter Sports cover you could well be able to make a claim for your gear. I asked this of my bank, explained that if I went to a dome and it got damaged/stolen they said I could put the claim in to them.

Everyone else is correct tha you shouldn't be expecting to claim against the dome...if that culture started we could wave goodbye to park nights for sure.
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
R1chOfflineNon-member
Post subject:   PostPosted: Mar 11, 2010 - 11:46 AM



First post: Jan 07, 2005
Total posts: 572
Location: London
Status: Offline
I think compensation culture aside... there is fair grounds to discuss the likely hood that somebody could do something very reckless (which would be there fault, rather than the slopes) to cause injury to somebody else.

Having any kind of insurance policy that covers you for public liability would certainly help if it was you being the reckless one.
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
ArdkorOfflineSCUK Member
Post subject:   PostPosted: Mar 11, 2010 - 12:06 PM



First post: Mar 01, 2010
Total posts: 106
Location: Manchester
Status: Offline
OK the reason I'm asking, is that someone who should know better, was going down the slope far too fast, lost control and barrelled into someone else.

The poor snowboarder was obviously very new and was just strapping into their board (in plain view I might add)

This skier, was not able to stop in what i would term as a reasonable time, and after hitting the hitting the snowboarder and damaging their gear they had to leave the slope (therby also losing their paid for time through no fault of their own)

I was just asking whether this would be covered by the slope, the skier or tough luck on the snow boarder.

I think I might try and find an insurance policy myself to cover me if I get hit, if I hit someone, and also cover accidental damage to my gear. ( although i think accidental cover may not be viable)

Thanks for your responses.

_________________
Back Soon!
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger  
Reply with quote Back to top
ChasKiOfflineSCUK Member
Post subject:   PostPosted: Mar 11, 2010 - 12:26 PM



First post: Mar 04, 2009
Total posts: 2317
Location: Plymouth/Stroud
Status: Offline
Ahhh, well you didn't say there was a skiier involved.

Did you get any photos? We can hunt them down, cover them in honey and then release the bees on them.
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Reply with quote Back to top
ArdkorOfflineSCUK Member
Post subject:   PostPosted: Mar 11, 2010 - 12:29 PM



First post: Mar 01, 2010
Total posts: 106
Location: Manchester
Status: Offline
Best response yet.

although the lift attendant did say to the snowboarder that they should have hit the skier with their snowboard, which made me laugh.

_________________
Back Soon!
 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger  
Reply with quote Back to top
yellowlalaOfflineNon-member
Post subject:   PostPosted: Mar 11, 2010 - 12:30 PM



First post: Mar 12, 2007
Total posts: 1594

Status: Offline
Ardkor wrote:


although the lift attendant did say to the snowboarder that they should have hit the skier with their snowboard, which made me laugh.


He had his priorities right.
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
cantridepeteOfflineNon-member
Post subject:   PostPosted: Mar 11, 2010 - 01:09 PM



First post: Oct 28, 2008
Total posts: 2147
Location: Haute Savoie
Status: Offline
if the skier could control his speed and stop etc then unfortunatly its just bad luck i would say....

the slope cant be held responsible for someone just being a dick Sad
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
R1chOfflineNon-member
Post subject:   PostPosted: Mar 11, 2010 - 03:08 PM



First post: Jan 07, 2005
Total posts: 572
Location: London
Status: Offline
cantridepete wrote:
if the skier could control his speed and stop etc then unfortunatly its just bad luck i would say....

the slope cant be held responsible for someone just being a dick Sad


I'm obviously no legal Eagle, but I'd imagine that if somebody was continually reckless, unable to control their speed and stop and the slope did nothing to warn or remove them (which is part of the warning they make you sign) then they could be exposing themselves. As they have created a warning and not enforced somebody's dangerous behavior and have a duty to the safety of their customers.

That said, I have seen Chavs kicked out of MK before who turned up in jeans and clearly just rented some boards and didn't know what they were doing.
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
philboarderOfflineNon-member
Post subject:   PostPosted: Mar 11, 2010 - 03:49 PM



First post: Jul 29, 2006
Total posts: 887

Status: Offline
sucks for your mate but doubt theres much that can be done. Im guessing there arent any policys for indoor domes yet.
 
 View user's profile Send private message  
Reply with quote Back to top
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Printable version Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Powered by PNphpBB2 © 2003-2006 The PNphpBB Group
Credits

SCUK MEMBERSHIP - JOIN FOR JUST £15

PROMO

SCUK SEARCH
Loading

LOGIN




 


 Log in Problems?
 New User? Sign Up!


THE SCUK SHOP

PROMO

COMMUNITY

OFFICIAL PARTNERS

FOLLOW US
Follow us on Facebook.com/snowboardclub Follow us on at Twitter.com/snowboardclub Follow our News via this feed

FEATURED